In the discussion of the doctrine of divine election, two primary positions arise to the forefront of the conversation. Historically, these two positions have been stated and defended by those who would classify themselves as classical Arminians and moderate Calvinists, respectively. Classical Arminians maintain that God’s election of men and women to salvation before the foundation of the world comes as a result of God foreseeing that particular person’s faith in Christ. God, in eternity and before he creates, foresees what specific people will place their faith in Christ and, at that point, elects them to salvation. This is commonly referred to as “conditional election,” since God’s election of a particular person depends upon their meeting a condition, namely, faith in Christ.
Origen (d. 254), argued that the “predestination language of the Bible encouraged pagan fatalism”(The Cross and Salvation, Bruce Demerest, 99) and thus spoke rather of a foreknowledge of men’s piety which preceded foreordination of their salvation. John Chrysostom of Antioch (d. 407), held that “God elects persons on the basis of his foreknowledge of their personal worthiness” (100). John Wesley (d.1791) vigorously opposed the “horrible decree” of predestination.
Jacob Arminius (d. 1609) whose name now designates the theological position under discussion, defined man’s free-will as his power of contrary choice. Spiritually speaking, this means that man has the ability to either choose Christ or reject him. Ultimately, however, the choice lies with the man. Although Arminius held to total depravity—man’s utter inability to repent and believe in Christ—he did maintain God gives “prevenient grace” to every man that decreases the effects of original sin and provides the ability for a person to choose Christ. God thus foresees who will choose him and subsequently elects them for salvation in eternity past.
Those who would be categorized under the heading of moderate Calvinism would assert that God’s election of men and women to salvation is based on nothing within or about the person, but is rather grounded solely in God’s own sovereign choice. This position would argue that God does not base his choice of particular men and women to salvation on any foreseen merit, including faith. Instead, God, in eternity and before he creates, chooses whom he will save. As time unfolds, God brings those people to genuine repentance and faith in Christ. This is generally called “unconditional election” since the election is not based on man meeting any condition.
Although the unconditional election was not explicitly articulated until Augustine (d. 430), there were some who demonstrated a growing commitment to God’s initiative in salvation. Men like Tertullian (d. 220), Athanasius (d. 373), and Ambrose (d. 397) spoke at times of those who were “prepared beforehand,” and of God’s sovereign choice to save those whom he chooses to save (114). Thomas Aquanis (d. 1274), John Gill (d. 1771), Charles Haddon Spurgeon (d. 1892) and A.H. Strong held that election is God’s unconditional choice of who he will bring to faith in Christ, not his conditional choice of those who he foresees will place their faith in Christ. The Westminster Confession of Faith (1647) provides a clear definition of unconditional election:
Those of mankind that are predestined unto life, God, before the foundation of the world was laid, according to his eternal and immutable purpose, and the secret counsel and good pleasure of his will, hath chosen in Christ, unto everlasting glory, out of his mere free grace and love, without any foresight of faith or good works, perseverance in either of them, or any other thing in the creature, as conditions, or causes moving him thereunto; and all the praise of his glorious grace (3.5) (116-117).
Over the next few days I will attempt to provide a biblical and theological defense of unconditional election, followed by answers to a common objection to unconditional election and a final essay outlining a few of the most glaring problems within conditional election.
Next: A Biblical and Theological Defense of Unconditional Election
Filed under: Salvation, Theology | Leave a Comment »



